Heap overflow vulnerability in Opera 9.0, 9.01
iDefense published details about a heap overflow vulnerability in Opera browsers.
The vulnerability can be exploited with a tag that contains a URL bigger than 256 bytes, and looks like a typical heap overflow which is relatively easy to exploit.
Opera versions 9.0 and 9.01 on both Windows and Linux are confirmed to be vulnerable. Version 8 is not vulnerable.
It is recommended that you upgrade to version 9.02 which fixes this vulnerability: http://www.opera.com/support/search/supsearch.dml?index=848.
The vulnerability can be exploited with a tag that contains a URL bigger than 256 bytes, and looks like a typical heap overflow which is relatively easy to exploit.
Opera versions 9.0 and 9.01 on both Windows and Linux are confirmed to be vulnerable. Version 8 is not vulnerable.
It is recommended that you upgrade to version 9.02 which fixes this vulnerability: http://www.opera.com/support/search/supsearch.dml?index=848.
Keywords:
0 comment(s)
Oracle Quarterly Critical Patch Update (Oct 2006)
Yesterday, Oracle released their quarterly updates.
http://www.oracle.com/technology/deploy/security/critical-patch-updates/cpuoct2006.html
David Litchfield released an excellent summary here:
http://www.databasesecurity.com/oracle/OracleOct2006-CPU-Analysis.pdf
There are too many updates (101) to go into much detail (or fully digest to be honest) here.
It is worth noting that there are gaps in coverage in the update.
From David's report:
The tools from Oracle, NGSSoftware and others for evaluating risk matrices based upon the Oracle applications, versions, and platforms in use highlights the complexity of determining exposure points. Its probably a good idea to use this strategy across all the applications and platforms in your environment and there are a number of tools to do this. And all of these techniques require a good system inventory which is kept up to date with the platforms and services installed in a network. Everyone keeps and maintains those too right?
It is also worth noting that Oracle has adopted the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
Additional summary details from the SC Magazine article (thanks to a certain person that sends out the highest number of news digests ever)
"The update delivered fixes for a host of company solutions, including
Oracle Database (22 patches), Application Server (14), E-Business Suite
(13) and PeopleSoft Enterprise (eight).
None of the bugs in Oracle Database - the vendor's most popular product
- are remotely exploitable without valid authorization, according to
the CPU. The highest Database risk assessment score - on a scale of 1
to 10 - was 4.2."
Additional links for those that like links:
http://blogs.oracle.com/security/2006/10/11#a33
http://www.scmagazine.com/uk/news/article/599039
http://secunia.com/advisories/22396/
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/20588
Thanks to everyone that submitted links and information (Juha-Matti, Ramu, and others)
Robert
ISC Handler on Duty
0 comment(s)
http://www.oracle.com/technology/deploy/security/critical-patch-updates/cpuoct2006.html
David Litchfield released an excellent summary here:
http://www.databasesecurity.com/oracle/OracleOct2006-CPU-Analysis.pdf
There are too many updates (101) to go into much detail (or fully digest to be honest) here.
It is worth noting that there are gaps in coverage in the update.
From David's report:
| Version | Platform |
Due |
| 9.2.0.6 |
All Operating Systems |
End of Oct. |
| 10.1.0.5 |
All Operating Systems |
End of Oct. |
| 10.2.0.1 |
Linux (Power) |
End of Oct. |
| 10.2.0.2 |
Windows |
End of Oct. |
The tools from Oracle, NGSSoftware and others for evaluating risk matrices based upon the Oracle applications, versions, and platforms in use highlights the complexity of determining exposure points. Its probably a good idea to use this strategy across all the applications and platforms in your environment and there are a number of tools to do this. And all of these techniques require a good system inventory which is kept up to date with the platforms and services installed in a network. Everyone keeps and maintains those too right?
It is also worth noting that Oracle has adopted the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
Additional summary details from the SC Magazine article (thanks to a certain person that sends out the highest number of news digests ever)
"The update delivered fixes for a host of company solutions, including
Oracle Database (22 patches), Application Server (14), E-Business Suite
(13) and PeopleSoft Enterprise (eight).
None of the bugs in Oracle Database - the vendor's most popular product
- are remotely exploitable without valid authorization, according to
the CPU. The highest Database risk assessment score - on a scale of 1
to 10 - was 4.2."
Additional links for those that like links:
http://blogs.oracle.com/security/2006/10/11#a33
http://www.scmagazine.com/uk/news/article/599039
http://secunia.com/advisories/22396/
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/20588
Thanks to everyone that submitted links and information (Juha-Matti, Ramu, and others)
Robert
ISC Handler on Duty
×
![modal content]()
Diary Archives
Comments
Anonymous
Dec 3rd 2022
9 months ago
Anonymous
Dec 3rd 2022
9 months ago
<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is described as follows because they respect your privacy and keep your data secure. The social networks are not interested in collecting data about you. They don't care about what you're doing, or what you like. They don't want to know who you talk to, or where you go.
<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is not interested in collecting data about you. They don't care about what you're doing, or what you like. They don't want to know who you talk to, or where you go. The social networks only collect the minimum amount of information required for the service that they provide. Your personal information is kept private, and is never shared with other companies without your permission
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
9 months ago
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
9 months ago
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> nearest public toilet to me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
9 months ago
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> nearest public toilet to me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
9 months ago
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
9 months ago
https://defineprogramming.com/
Dec 26th 2022
9 months ago
distribute malware. Even if the URL listed on the ad shows a legitimate website, subsequent ad traffic can easily lead to a fake page. Different types of malware are distributed in this manner. I've seen IcedID (Bokbot), Gozi/ISFB, and various information stealers distributed through fake software websites that were provided through Google ad traffic. I submitted malicious files from this example to VirusTotal and found a low rate of detection, with some files not showing as malware at all. Additionally, domains associated with this infection frequently change. That might make it hard to detect.
https://clickercounter.org/
https://defineprogramming.com/
Dec 26th 2022
9 months ago
rthrth
Jan 2nd 2023
8 months ago