ISC StormCast for Tuesday, July 9th 2013 http://isc.sans.edu/podcastdetail.html?id=3406
Microsoft July 2013 Black Tuesday Overview
Overview of the July 2013 Microsoft patches and their status.
| # | Affected | Contra Indications - KB | Known Exploits | Microsoft rating(**) | ISC rating(*) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| clients | servers | |||||
| MS13-052 | Multiple vulnerabilities allow privilege escalation and/or remote code execution. | |||||
|
.NET & silverlight CVE-2013-3129 CVE-2013-3131 CVE-2013-3132 CVE-2013-3133 CVE-2013-3134 CVE-2013-3171 CVE-2013-3178 |
KB 2861561 | Microsoft claims CVE-2013-3131 and CVE-2013-3134 have been publicly disclosed. |
Severity:Critical Exploitability:1 |
Critical | Important | |
| MS13-053 | Multiple vulnerabilities allow privelege escalation and/or remote code execution. | |||||
|
kernel mode drivers (KMD) CVE-2013-1300 CVE-2013-1340 CVE-2013-1345 CVE-2013-3129 CVE-2013-3167 CVE-2013-3172 CVE-2013-3173 CVE-2013-3660 |
KB 2850851 | Microsoft claims CVE-2013-3172 and CVE-2013-3660 have been publicly disclosed. Moreover they claim to be aware of "targeted" attacks exploiting CVE-2013-3660. |
Severity:Critical Exploitability:1 |
PATCH NOW | Important | |
| MS13-054 | A truetype font parsing issue in the GDI+ library allows remote code execution. This affects a wide selection of sofware and extra care should be given to make sure to patch all instances. | |||||
|
GDI+ CVE-2013-3129 |
KB 2848295 | No publicly known exploits. |
Severity:Critical Exploitability:1 |
Critical | Important | |
| MS13-055 | A multitude of vulnerabilities are fixed in this month's IE cumulative patch, you want this one. All but one are memory corruption vulnerabilities. | |||||
|
MSIE CVE-2013-3115 CVE-2013-3143 CVE-2013-3144 CVE-2013-3145 CVE-2013-3146 CVE-2013-3147 CVE-2013-3148 CVE-2013-3149 CVE-2013-3150 CVE-2013-3151 CVE-2013-3152 CVE-2013-3153 CVE-2013-3161 CVE-2013-3162 CVE-2013-3163 CVE-2013-3164 CVE-2013-3166 |
KB 2846071 | No publicly known exploits |
Severity:Critical Exploitability:1 |
Critical | Important | |
| MS13-056 | An input validation problem in how directShow handles GIF file allows random code execution. | |||||
|
DirectShow CVE-2013-3174 |
KB 2845187 | No publicly known exploits |
Severity:Critical Exploitability:1 |
Critical | Important | |
| MS13-057 | An input validation problem in windows media format (WMV - windows media player, not to be confused with the infamous WMF format) allows random code execution. | |||||
|
Media Player CVE-2013-3127 |
KB 2847883 | No publicly known exploits |
Severity:Critical Exploitability:2 |
Critical | Important | |
| MS13-058 | An unquoted path vulnerability (see more on what this is in Mark Bagget's excellent diary on the unquoted path issues) in windows defender allows privilege esclation to the localsystem account. | |||||
|
Windows defender CVE-2013-3154 |
KB 2847927 | No publicly known exploits |
Severity:Important Exploitability:1 |
Important | Important | |
We will update issues on this page for about a week or so as they evolve.
We appreciate updates
US based customers can call Microsoft for free patch related support on 1-866-PCSAFETY
We appreciate updates
US based customers can call Microsoft for free patch related support on 1-866-PCSAFETY
(*): ISC rating
-
We use 4 levels:
- PATCH NOW: Typically used where we see immediate danger of exploitation. Typical environments will want to deploy these patches ASAP. Workarounds are typically not accepted by users or are not possible. This rating is often used when typical deployments make it vulnerable and exploits are being used or easy to obtain or make.
- Critical: Anything that needs little to become "interesting" for the dark side. Best approach is to test and deploy ASAP. Workarounds can give more time to test.
- Important: Things where more testing and other measures can help.
- Less Urgent: Typically we expect the impact if left unpatched to be not that big a deal in the short term. Do not forget them however.
- The difference between the client and server rating is based on how you use the affected machine. We take into account the typical client and server deployment in the usage of the machine and the common measures people typically have in place already. Measures we presume are simple best practices for servers such as not using outlook, MSIE, word etc. to do traditional office or leisure work.
- The rating is not a risk analysis as such. It is a rating of importance of the vulnerability and the perceived or even predicted threat for affected systems. The rating does not account for the number of affected systems there are. It is for an affected system in a typical worst-case role.
- Only the organization itself is in a position to do a full risk analysis involving the presence (or lack of) affected systems, the actually implemented measures, the impact on their operation and the value of the assets involved.
- All patches released by a vendor are important enough to have a close look if you use the affected systems. There is little incentive for vendors to publicize patches that do not have some form of risk to them.
(**): The exploitability rating we show is the worst of them all due to the too large number of ratings Microsoft assigns to some of the patches.
--
Swa Frantzen
Adobe July 2013 Black Tuesday Overview
Adobe released their July 2013 Black Tueday bulletins:
| # | Affected | CVE | Adobe rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| APSB13-17 | Flash Player |
CVE-2013-3344 CVE-2013-3345 CVE-2013-3347 |
Critical |
| APSB13-18 | Shockwave | CVE-2013-3348 | Critical |
| APSB13-19 | Coldfusion |
CVE-2013-3349 CVE-2013-3350 |
Critical (v10) Important (v9) |
--
Swa Frantzen
×
![modal content]()
Diary Archives
Comments
Anonymous
Dec 3rd 2022
9 months ago
Anonymous
Dec 3rd 2022
9 months ago
<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is described as follows because they respect your privacy and keep your data secure. The social networks are not interested in collecting data about you. They don't care about what you're doing, or what you like. They don't want to know who you talk to, or where you go.
<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is not interested in collecting data about you. They don't care about what you're doing, or what you like. They don't want to know who you talk to, or where you go. The social networks only collect the minimum amount of information required for the service that they provide. Your personal information is kept private, and is never shared with other companies without your permission
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
8 months ago
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
8 months ago
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> nearest public toilet to me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
8 months ago
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> nearest public toilet to me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
8 months ago
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
8 months ago
https://defineprogramming.com/
Dec 26th 2022
8 months ago
distribute malware. Even if the URL listed on the ad shows a legitimate website, subsequent ad traffic can easily lead to a fake page. Different types of malware are distributed in this manner. I've seen IcedID (Bokbot), Gozi/ISFB, and various information stealers distributed through fake software websites that were provided through Google ad traffic. I submitted malicious files from this example to VirusTotal and found a low rate of detection, with some files not showing as malware at all. Additionally, domains associated with this infection frequently change. That might make it hard to detect.
https://clickercounter.org/
https://defineprogramming.com/
Dec 26th 2022
8 months ago
rthrth
Jan 2nd 2023
8 months ago