The latest patches from Symantec are causing quite a bit of confusion. To reiterate again what Kevin wrote in his diary (http://isc.sans.org/diary.php?storyid=1368):
*ALL* versions of 10.0.x and 10.1.x of Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition and 3.0.x and 3.1.x of Symantec Client Security seem to be vulnerable.
Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition version 8.x and 9.x seem to be ok.
Symantec released 4 patches for each product (http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/security/Content/2006.05.25.html):
Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition
10.1.0.394 -> 10.1.0.396 (there's a typo here on their web, it's not version 3)
10.1.0.400 -> 10.1.0.401
10.0.2.2010 -> 10.0.2.2011
10.0.2.2020 -> 10.0.2.2021
Symantec Client Security
188.8.131.524 -> 184.108.40.2066
220.127.116.110 -> 18.104.22.1681
22.214.171.1240 -> 126.96.36.1991
188.8.131.520 -> 184.108.40.2061
Now, if you are running *ANY* other version that is affected, you will have to first upgrade to one of the versions that have the patch out and then install the patch. I hope this will clear the confusion.
There seem to be some mitigations to the problem though. As eEye stated, this is a remotely exploitable vulnerability. Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition, when in managed mode, will have the service Rtvscan.exe listening on TCP port 2967. In case that your host based firewall is configured to block access to this port (effectively meaning that you can't manage the client from the centralized server, at least not until the client connects to it) you should be ok.
On our test machine, the unmanaged installation of Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition didn't have any listeners so it looks like it's safe, at least from a remote exploit over the network (patch in any case!).
If we get more information we'll update the diary. Thanks to Gary for help with this.
I will be teaching next: Web App Penetration Testing and Ethical Hacking - SANS Munich February 2022
May 31st 2006
|Thread locked Subscribe||
May 31st 2006
1 decade ago